Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The appellant's son meets the criteria for death pension benefits as he served during a period of war and is not in the custody of his mother's surviving spouse. Their combined income did not exceed the maximum annual pension rate (MAPR) for 2009, allowing for the award of death pension.

The deciding factor: The appellant's son was in the custody of his mother, who served as a personal custodian, and their combined income did not exceed the MAPR for 2009.

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
100%
Decision date
November 13, 2014
Citation
1450304

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1450304.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.