The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses for treatment at Mid-Michigan Medical Center from December 9 to 11, 2013 was denied because he held other health care coverage (Medicare).
The deciding factor: The Veteran had other health care coverage in the form of Medicare.
- Claimed conditions
- Irregular heartbeat
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 25, 2014
- Citation
- 1452235
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1452235.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran was seen in a non-VA emergency room for irregular heartbeat on July 2, 2020. The claim is remanded to determine if the appellant is eligible for reimbursement under 38 U.S.C. § 1725 due to partial coverage from other health insurance.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for congestive heart failure and irregular heartbeat, finding that the Veteran's current heart disabilities are not related to his active service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the claim of entitlement to service connection for an irregular heartbeat should be remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding its onset and relationship to service.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the claim of entitlement to service connection for a disorder manifested by an irregular heartbeat due to the Veteran's withdrawal. The claims for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and PTSD are remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.