The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for left elbow and left wrist disabilities were denied by the RO in a March 2009 rating decision. The Board remanded the cases to obtain additional evidence, but the Veteran failed to appear for an examination scheduled on July 30, 2013. A VA examination was conducted on November 26, 2013, and more recent records are needed before a final determination can be made.
The deciding factor: The claims were denied as there is no evidence of service connection for the disabilities in question or any other basis for granting increased ratings.
- Claimed conditions
- posttraumatic arthritis of the left elbow, residual malunion, fracture of the left ulna with dislocation of the radial head, ulnar nerve damage
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 5, 2014
- Citation
- 1453761
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1453761.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand both claims of compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of heart surgery and ulnar nerve damage due to inadequate medical opinions, requiring new evaluations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted a 50 percent rating for ulnar nerve damage. The petition to reopen the claim for stomach muscle strain as secondary to crush injury is remanded, and separate ratings are also remanded for ulnar nerve damage, median nerve damage, and lower radicular group nerve damage. A TDIU issue is referred back to the RO.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining additional VA treatment records and scheduling a new VA examination to assess the Veteran's left ulnar nerve disability. The issue of entitlement to TDIU is also being remanded.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 30 percent for his left elbow disability, finding that further development was needed. The appeal is currently remanded to obtain additional evidence and provide another VA examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.