The Veteran's post-operative anal fistulectomy with incontinence was rated at 10 percent for the period prior to August 1, 2012.,For the period from August 1, 2012 to January 14, 2014, the Veteran's disability warranted a rating of 30 percent.,Since January 14, 2014, the Veteran is entitled to a 60 percent rating for his post-operative anal fistulectomy with incontinence.,The claim for service connection for post polio complications was reopened.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show that the Veteran's symptoms warranted a higher rating prior to August 1, 2012. The VA examination indicated no loss of sphincter control and occasional moderate leakage.,From August 1, 2012 to January 14, 2014, the Veteran had extensive leaking and fairly frequent involuntary bowel movements, warranting a 30 percent rating under Diagnostic Code 7335.,Since January 14, 2014, the Veteran's symptoms more closely approximated the criteria for a 60 percent rating due to 'extensive' leakage and 'fairly frequent' involuntary bowel movements.,New evidence received since July 2004 raised a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim for service connection for post polio complications.
- Claimed conditions
- Post-operative anal fistulectomy with incontinence, Scar, post-operative anal fistulectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- December 19, 2014
- Citation
- 1455952
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1455952.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.