Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

Service connection is granted for asthma, and the Veteran's current respiratory condition is related to service.,Service connection is denied for pulmonary embolism. The Board finds that there is no evidence of a relationship between the post-service diagnosis and service.,Service connection is denied for blurred vision. The Board finds that there is no evidence of a relationship between the post-service symptoms and service.,Service connection is granted for bilateral pes planus, as it was not aggravated by service beyond its natural progression.,Service connection is granted for nighttime incontinence, which is proximately due to or a result of the Veteran's service-connected psychiatric disability.

The deciding factor: The presence of current asthma during the period of the claim justifies granting service connection. The diagnosis was related to service treatment records and VA examination findings.,There is no evidence linking pulmonary embolism to service or any other condition present in service. The Board finds that there is no relationship between the post-service diagnosis and service.,The Veteran's current complaints of blurred vision are not linked to service, as there was no mention of such symptoms during service treatment records. There is also no evidence linking the current condition to service.,Service connection for bilateral pes planus is granted because it was not aggravated by service beyond its natural progression. The Board finds that the Veteran's pre-existing pes planus did not worsen due to service, and there are other conditions separately service connected.,The Veteran's nighttime incontinence is proximately due to or a result of her service-connected psychiatric disability.

Claimed conditions
Asthma, Pulmonary Embolism, Blurred Vision, Bilateral Pes Planus, Nighttime Incontinence, Uterine Fibroids, Pancreatitis and Residuals, Radial Nerve Disorder, Hand Tremors
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 8, 2015
Citation
1500723

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1500723.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.