The Board found that the evidence submitted since the November 1988 decision is cumulative and redundant of previous evidence, thus not material to reopen the claims for service connection for cushing's disease and panhypopituitarism.
The deciding factor: The new evidence does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to reopen the previously denied claim of service connection for cushing's disease and panhypopituitarism as it contains evidence of diagnoses and treatment for these conditions, which was already submitted to the Board at the time of the November 1988 decision.
- Claimed conditions
- cushing's disease, panhypopituitarism
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 8, 2015
- Citation
- 1500908
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1500908.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for chronic fainting spells and/or dizziness due to a pituitary gland issue has been denied. The Board found no evidence linking these symptoms to his military service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's panhypopituitarism resulted in at most two documented episodes of dehydration requiring parenteral hydration over a one-year period, which qualifies for a 60 percent rating under the former version of DC 7909.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection and an increased rating due to incomplete development of private treatment records. The AOJ is instructed to obtain Dr. G.'s records, update VA treatment records, and provide a new VA examination if necessary.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's service-connected panhypopituitarism is currently evaluated as a disability rating of 40 percent, and the Board finds that there were no documented episodes of dehydration requiring parenteral hydration at any time during the appeal period. Therefore, the claim for a higher disability rating is denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.