The Veteran's claim for non-service-connected pension was granted in June 2008 with an effective date of August 16, 2007. The Board found that the July 2006 claim did not include a claim for non-service-connected pension and the November 2006 medical record from Dr. R.E.K. is not considered an informal claim.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's July 2006 claim did not indicate intent to seek non-service-connected pension benefits, nor did it evidence a belief in entitlement to such benefit.
- Claimed conditions
- Multiple allergies to chemicals, Asbestosis, Chemical sensitivities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 23, 2015
- Citation
- 1503474
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1503474.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's TBI alone rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation, and he is eligible for SMC at the housebound rate due to his single total disability rating with additional disabilities rated at least 60 percent.
- Dismissed
The appeal for an initial compensable disability rating for service-connected hearing loss is dismissed. An initial 30 percent disability rating for asbestosis is granted.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for a 100% disability rating for service-connected interstitial lung disease (ILD) and asbestosis has been dismissed due to the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal.
- Denied
The Veteran's asbestosis is rated at 10 percent, and the Board found that a higher rating is not warranted based on post-bronchodilator FVC scores.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.