The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 was denied because the evidence does not show that his additional disability resulted from VA medical treatment, and there is no indication of fault or negligence on the part of VA.
The deciding factor: The August 2011 VA examination concluded that the Veteran's right shoulder rotator cuff injury was a result of a partial tear diagnosed in 2000, which was treated appropriately with conservative therapy. The radiologist's mistaken interpretation of an arthrogram did not cause any harm and there was no negligence or fault on the part of VA.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Shoulder Rotator Cuff Injury, Chronic Pain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 19, 2015
- Citation
- 1507248
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1507248.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's appeal for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on housebound status or the need for regular aid and attendance was denied as there is no evidence of significant disabilities that would require such benefits.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for eligibility to enroll in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) as he is able to independently perform activities of daily living and does not need personal care services.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran is granted a Level 2 stipend under VA's PCAFC, as he requires personal care services due to multiple health conditions and cognitive impairment, making him unable to self-sustain in the community.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits is remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding his need for personal care services.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.