The Board has granted service connection for the residuals of cold injuries of the feet with an effective date of December 5, 1945.
The deciding factor: The Veteran filed a formal claim within one year of his discharge from service, and the April 1946 rating decision was found to contain clear and unmistakable error (CUE).
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of cold injuries of the feet
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 27, 2015
- Citation
- 1508772
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1508772.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of cold injuries to his feet and finds that these conditions are caused by in-service exposure to cold weather. The Board grants service connection for degenerative joint disease, cold intolerance, varicosities, and paresthesias of the feet.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a low back disability and the Veteran's claim of CUE in the denial of his claim for residuals of cold injuries of the feet. The effective date for service connection was not changed.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss and residuals of cold injuries of the feet due to lack of evidence showing these conditions were incurred or aggravated during active military service.
- Denied
The Veteran's initial claim for service connection of his bilateral foot disability was denied in a July 1970 rating decision. He did not appeal this denial, and as such, the decision became final. In September 2008, he filed a petition to reopen his previously denied claim, which resulted in an effective date of September 3, 2008.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.