The Veteran's left eye disability, including loss of vision, was not caused or aggravated by VA treatment. Therefore, the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is denied.
The deciding factor: VA medical care did not cause or aggravate the Veteran's pre-existing left eye condition resulting in loss of vision.
- Claimed conditions
- Left Eye Disability, Loss of Vision
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 2, 2015
- Citation
- 1508998
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1508998.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for right eye, left eye, left knee, and back disabilities due to conflicting statements from the Veteran and inconsistencies in his medical records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate TERA opinion and requests an addendum opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's vision disorder, specifically addressing his conceded exposure to fuel contaminants in ground water.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied an extension of the temporary total evaluation based on convalescence following surgery for residuals of the Veteran's left eye injury, finding that there was no evidence of severe postoperative residuals or necessity for house confinement after September 30, 2010.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for an enlarged prostate, bladder disability, right eye disability, and left eye disability. The evidence did not support a finding of direct service connection or secondary service connection.,Service connection was denied because the medical opinions were against a link between the disabilities and active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.