Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that additional development is necessary before the claims can be fully adjudicated, including obtaining medical opinions and records.

The deciding factor: The decision was remanded due to inconsistencies in the evidence and the need for clarification of certain diagnoses and treatment histories.

Claimed conditions
pseudofolliculitis barbae, prostatitis, right ankle condition, seborrheic keratosis of the scalp
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
April 2, 2015
Citation
1514196

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1514196.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.