The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including obtaining VA and private treatment records, a VA foot examination to determine the nature and etiology of his pre-existing bilateral pes planus, and readjudication of the service connection claim.
The deciding factor: Further evidence is needed to fully assess the Veteran's claims, particularly regarding the nature and etiology of his pre-existing bilateral pes planus.
- Claimed conditions
- acquired bilateral foot disorder to include pes planus (flat feet), pre-existing bilateral pes planus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 22, 2015
- Citation
- 1517326
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1517326.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection of pre-existing bilateral pes planus, finding that there was no increase in severity during his active service and thus not meeting the criteria for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to inadequate VA examinations and failure to obtain all necessary medical records. The Veteran's pre-existing bilateral pes planus is being reviewed for aggravation during service, while right lower extremity and left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy are being evaluated for direct and secondary service connection.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.