The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the cause of the Veteran's current foot drop, incontinence, and sexual dysfunction following his April 2006 lumbar fusion surgery. The service connection claim for PTSD will also be remanded as there is no medical opinion regarding its etiology.
The deciding factor: The Board found that additional development was needed to determine the cause of the Veteran's current foot drop, incontinence, and sexual dysfunction following his April 2006 lumbar fusion surgery. The service connection claim for PTSD will also be remanded as there is no medical opinion regarding its etiology.
- Claimed conditions
- Foot drop, Incontinence, Sexual dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 23, 2015
- Citation
- 1517417
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1517417.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted an effective date of July 15, 2020 for the award of special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the Veteran's service-connected PTSD with alcohol use disorder and additional disabilities. The decision also grants TDIU since June 16, 2015.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for GERD, voice impairment, and sexual dysfunction as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected residuals of lung adenocarcinoma.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA decision on eligibility for PCAFC benefits was legally inadequate and remanded to allow for a more thorough review of the Veteran's specific circumstances, including his need for supervision and assistance with ADLs.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted service connection for intervertebral disc syndrome with discectomy and laminectomy, left lower extremity sciatic nerve radiculopathy, right lower extremity sciatic nerve radiculopathy, and incontinence as secondary to the Veteran's IVDS.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.