The Board has determined that additional evidentiary development is necessary prior to the adjudication of the issues on appeal, including obtaining outstanding SSA records and private treatment records, clarifying the type and amount of SSA benefits received by the Veteran, scheduling a VA examination for homebound status or need for aid and attendance, evaluating all nonservice-connected disabilities, and readjudicating the income issue in light of special monthly pension rates.
The deciding factor: The appeal is remanded due to incomplete information regarding the type and amount of SSA benefits received by the Veteran, as well as discrepancies between private treatment records and VA examination findings regarding the Veteran's need for aid and attendance or homebound status. Additionally, further evaluation of all nonservice-connected disabilities is required.
- Claimed conditions
- right upper extremity weakness and numbness due to a hemorrhagic stroke, right lower extremity weakness and numbness due to a hemorrhagic stroke, stage II-IV cirrhosis with hepatitis C
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 23, 2015
- Citation
- 1517469
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1517469.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection and nonservice-connected pension benefits, finding that there was no evidence of a nexus between his current conditions and his military service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.