The Veteran seeks service connection for shin pain, which he claims is related to his in-service diagnosis of stress fractures/shin splints. The VA examiner found no pathology to render a diagnosis but did not address the possible etiology of the Veteran's shin pain as it relates to his shin splints during service.
The deciding factor: The VA examination did not provide an opinion on the likely etiology of the Veteran's shin pain, which is related to in-service shin splints and current symptomatology.
- Claimed conditions
- shin pain, stress fractures/shin splints
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 1, 2015
- Citation
- 1518811
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1518811.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The veteran's claims for higher ratings for left wrist tendinitis and left knee patellofemoral pain syndrome, as well as service connection for PTSD and shin pain, were denied. Claims for service connection for other conditions were remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for sinusitis has been denied as she does not have a current diagnosis of the condition.,The evidence submitted since the last final denial does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim of left ear hearing loss, and thus the application to reopen this claim is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a chronic left ankle disorder, back disorder, or right great toe disorder related to service. The bilateral foot pain is also denied as there is no evidence of a current disability related to in-service manifestations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.