The Veteran's urinary disability was incurred in service and the Board finds that it is at least as likely as not related to his service, including his in-service chlamydia infection. Service connection for a urinary disability is granted.
The deciding factor: The private doctor's opinion regarding the Veteran's urinary disability is in favor of the urinary disability and the VA examiner found that the Veteran's claimed conditions are secondary to his chlamydia and surgery to cure it, resulting in urethral stricture.
- Claimed conditions
- urinary disability, urethral stricture disease, urethritis, urethrotomy, urethral dilations
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 18, 2015
- Citation
- 1521052
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1521052.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation since August 28, 2009. The Board has granted TDIU from that date.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty-to-assist error, specifically regarding the Veteran's service connection claim for BPH. The AOJ is instructed to obtain an addendum medical opinion that considers the Veteran's treatment for urethritis during his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including prostate cancer and urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder, tinnitus, and urethritis, have prevented him from securing or following substantially gainful employment. The Board has granted a TDIU based on these conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to credibility issues with his testimony and lack of supporting medical evidence. The case is being returned for additional development, including obtaining records from the Army National Guard period, left knee surgery records, clarification on TERA exposure details, and a new opinion regarding prostate cancer.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.