The Board denied the claim for service connection for cause of the Veteran's death, finding that urosepsis was not incurred in or caused by service and there was no evidence of exposure to herbicides during service.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran died from urosepsis, which is not a disease associated with exposure to herbicide agents used in Vietnam. There was also no evidence of exposure to herbicides during his service at Takhli Royal Thai Air Force Base.
- Claimed conditions
- urosepsis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 22, 2015
- Citation
- 1522038
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1522038.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was not caused by his military service, including exposure to herbicide agents. The cause of death is attributed to rectal cancer with lung metastasis and associated complications.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient explanation of the cause of death on the Veteran's death certificate, inadequacy of the VA medical opinion regarding informed consent and complications from catheter replacement, and other procedural issues. Further development is needed including obtaining additional VA records and a new medical opinion.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that his death was caused by a combination of pre-existing conditions including coronary artery disease and other risk factors.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the possible link between the Veteran's in-service exposure and his death, as well as the possible link between his service-connected urethritis and his fatal conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.