The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including scheduling a VA examination and obtaining medical records.
The deciding factor: The Veteran missed an initial VA examination scheduled in October 2013 due to lack of transportation. The Board finds that he had good cause for missing the examination and should be rescheduled.
- Claimed conditions
- fractured mandible
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 2, 2015
- Citation
- 1523083
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1523083.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran's service-connected residuals of fractured mandible do not warrant a rating in excess of 0 percent, and the claim for an increased rating is denied. The cervical spine fracture issue is remanded due to incomplete examination.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher evaluation prior to April 17, 2013 was denied as his interincisal range of motion remained within the 21 to 29 millimeters range and he could consume soft foods.,A 40 percent rating was granted effective April 17, 2013 due to limited interincisal motion between 11 and 20 millimeters and dietary restrictions to soft and semi-soft foods. The Veteran's condition warranted this evaluation as of that date.,The claim for a higher evaluation since April 17, 2013 was denied as his interincisal range of motion did not reach the level where it would warrant an evaluation in excess of 40 percent.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a dental disability is denied as there is no evidence of loss of substance of the maxilla or mandible due to an in-service injury, and compensation is not available for treatable carious teeth.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's initial rating for residuals from a fractured mandible was granted at 40 percent, effective October 30, 2018. The appeal is denied for an initial rating higher than 40 percent for the entirety of the appeal period.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.