The Veteran's ankle disabilities resulted in some limitations of motion and instability, but the Veteran had a normal gait and was able to work as a policeman with use of ankle braces prior to September 10, 2008. From September 10, 2008 to April 2009, the right ankle disability resulted in marked limitation of motion and instability requiring evaluation and assistive devices, but not warranting an increased rating. The left ankle disability from September 10, 2008 to March 10, 2011 also resulted in marked limitation of motion and instability, but no more than marked limitation of motion was met.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's ankle disabilities did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation prior to September 10, 2008 due to his ability to work full-time with use of ankle braces. From September 10, 2008 to March 10, 2011, the disability met the criteria for a 20 percent rating based on marked limitation of motion.
- Claimed conditions
- Left ankle sprain with calcaneal spur, Right ankle sprain with limitation of motion and hypertrophic spurring at the insertion of the Achilles' tendon
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 4, 2015
- Citation
- 1523666
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1523666.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied. The right and left ankle disabilities are currently rated at the maximum allowable under VA regulations, while the low back disability is rated at 10 percent.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.