The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling the Veteran for examinations to assess his lumbosacral back strain and adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct.
The deciding factor: The decision is being remanded due to the need for additional medical evidence and evaluations to determine the current severity of the Veteran's service-connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, lumbosacral back strain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 11, 2015
- Citation
- 1525086
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1525086.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for a higher initial rating of 70 percent for his adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct is granted. The claim for TDIU is remanded due to the failure to provide adequate development.
- Partly granted
The Board denied an initial disability rating in excess of 30 percent for chronic headaches and granted effective dates of June 13, 2020 for service connection for tinnitus and lumbosacral back strain. The claims for service connection for a dental disorder and increased rating for lumbosacral strain were remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim for a VA examination to determine the etiology of the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder, as the prior examinations were not conducted in his home state and he was unable to attend them.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) on an extraschedular basis, finding that his service-connected disabilities alone did not render him unable to secure and follow substantially gainful employment.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.