The Veteran's left shoulder disability was manifested by pain with full range of motion from August 28, 2002 to December 1, 2002. No higher rating is warranted as there was no evidence of ankylosis or loss of strength.
The deciding factor: Painful motion without limitation of motion at shoulder level or midway between side and shoulder level did not warrant a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 5201.
- Claimed conditions
- Left Shoulder Injury with Surgical Repair
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- June 24, 2015
- Citation
- 1526957
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1526957.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board found that the termination of the TDIU rating from February 1, 2004 was proper due to the Veteran's actual employability at that time.
- Denied
The Veteran's initial claim for a compensable evaluation for his left shoulder disability was denied.,Subsequent claims for evaluations in excess of 10 percent were also denied during the periods from December 2, 2002 to May 22, 2003 and October 1, 2003 to March 8, 2004.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.