The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to determine the etiology of his toenail fungus and whether it is related to service.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner will need to provide an opinion on the likely etiology of the Veteran's toenail fungus, including whether it is related to his first period of active duty service or any period of ACDUTRA.
- Claimed conditions
- Toenail fungus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 30, 2015
- Citation
- 1527944
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1527944.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for toenail fungus was denied. The Board found no evidence of toenail fungus during service and insufficient medical evidence to establish a relationship between the condition and service.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for toenail fungus, finding that it did not originate in service and is not otherwise etiologically related to service. The Board also remanded the issue of entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss.,For the hearing loss issue, the Board found conflicting evidence regarding whether the Veteran had a hearing disability at any point between May 21, 2013 (the date VA received his claim) and the May 2015 VA examination. The Board directed the RO to obtain another VA examination to reconcile these findings.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's toenail fungus began in service and has continued since then, meeting the criteria for direct service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the cases of GERD, toenail fungus, and TDIU due to inadequate VA examinations and the need for additional development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.