Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient rationale in a previous VA examination report regarding tinnitus. The Veteran is required to provide additional evidence and undergo further examination.

The deciding factor: The VA audiologist's opinion was based on the appellant not indicating that he had tinnitus, which appears incongruent with prior records showing complaints of tinnitus.

Claimed conditions
left ear tinnitus
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
July 6, 2015
Citation
1528888

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1528888.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.