Effective dates of December 21, 2006 for the award of additional compensation for L.D.C., E.D.E., R.E.N.W., and M.D.W. (the Veteran's dependent spouse), E.D.E., R.E.N.W., and M.D.W. (the Veteran's dependent stepchildren), and A.J.C. (the Veteran's dependent child).,Effective dates of March 19, 2007 for the award of additional compensation for E.D.E., the Veteran's dependent stepchild; July 3, 2007 for the award of additional compensation for A.A.C., the Veteran's dependent child.
The deciding factor: The effective dates were assigned based on the date of claim and the date of dependency arising.
- Claimed conditions
- L.D.C., R.E.N.W., M.D.W., E.D.E., A.J.C., A.A.C.
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- July 16, 2015
- Citation
- 1530370
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1530370.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's children were recognized for VA compensation purposes as of their respective dates of birth. The Board denied the request for an earlier effective date, finding that a written claim was not submitted until September 22, 2021.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.