The Board found that the Veteran's benign prostate hypertrophy did not manifest during or as a result of active military service and was not caused by, or aggravated by, a service-connected disability. Therefore, service connection for this condition is denied.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of evidence demonstrated that the Veteran's benign prostate hypertrophy did not manifest during his military service and was not related to any service-connected disability.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate hypertrophy, urinary dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 24, 2015
- Citation
- 1531746
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1531746.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for a TDIU based on his service-connected prostate cancer residuals with urinary dysfunction is dismissed as moot because he is already receiving a 100% disability rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's petition to restore a 20 percent rating for his service-connected sebaceous cyst of the scrotum has been granted. The reduction from 20 percent to noncompensable was improper.,Service connection for urinary dysfunction, which is no longer considered part and parcel of the service-connected sebaceous cyst, remains in dispute.
- Whole decision: Granted
The appeal is granted for the severance of service connection for hepatic steatosis (fatty liver disease) and remanded for further action on the issue of service connection for urinary dysfunction.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection and SMC based on loss of use of the creative organ is granted with an effective date of August 14, 2019. The appeal for increased evaluations for urinary dysfunction, lung cancer residuals, testicular cancer residuals, retro-peritoneum lymph node metastasis, and erectile dysfunction is denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.