The Board found that the Veteran's gastrointestinal, navel, and nose disabilities were not incurred during active service or due to any incident occurring during his active service. The VA examinations concluded that there was no evidence of a pre-existing condition in service and that the current conditions are more likely related to post-service events.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's assertions regarding continuity of symptoms since service were not supported by medical evidence or records, and the VA examiner opined that his gastrointestinal and navel disabilities are less likely than not incurred during active service.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of intestinal disability, residuals of navel disability, residuals of nose injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 3, 2015
- Citation
- 1532976
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1532976.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, sleep apnea, and residuals of a broken nose were denied due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to his active duty service.,Service connection was granted for the Veteran's residuals of a broken nose based on credible lay statements and medical opinion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and evaluations.
- Denied
The Board has determined that there is no competent, probative evidence suggesting the Veteran currently has any residual eye or nose injuries from service. The claims for service connection are therefore denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to legal error in denying an increased rating based on medication effects, and a new VA examination is required.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.