The Board has decided to remand the claim for further development due to inconsistencies in the medical opinion provided and the need for additional VA examination.
The deciding factor: The April 2015 VA examiner's opinion is inconsistent with VA policies regarding asbestos-related diseases, requiring a new opinion based on VA guidelines.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of non-small cell lung cancer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 17, 2015
- Citation
- 1535190
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1535190.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for initial compensable ratings for residuals of non-small cell lung cancer, left posterior trunk scars, and left anterior truck scars have been denied as the medical evidence does not support a higher rating based on current disability levels.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for ratings related to his lung cancer and lymph node metastasis have been dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of non-small cell lung cancer, finding no evidence to support a nexus between his current condition and military service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.