The Board finds reopening of the claim is warranted, and the issue of entitlement to compensation for left eye vision loss on a de novo basis is REMANDED to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ) for further development and consideration.
The deciding factor: Evidence received since a June 2009 Board decision denying entitlement to compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for left eye vision loss is neither cumulative nor redundant, pertains to the basis for the prior denial, and raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- left eye vision loss
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 26, 2015
- Citation
- 1536513
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1536513.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's initial claim for a left eye retinal scar (claimed as left eye vision loss) was granted with an initial noncompensable rating. For the period prior to September 11, 2023, she is now receiving a 10 percent rating. The matter of her increased rating since September 11, 2023, remains pending.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death during the pendency of the appeal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case for a new evaluation of the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to his left eye vision loss resulting from a June 2021 VA medical procedure.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for alopecia was denied as the evidence did not show loss of all body hair.,Service connection for a left hip condition, left eye vision loss, and left foot condition were denied due to lack of current disability. Service connection for a lung condition was also denied.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a lung condition was denied as there is no evidence of a current disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.