The Veteran claims service connection for bilateral upper extremity nerve entrapment, which he believes is related to his service. The November 2010 VA examination did not find any neurological impairment, but the December 2012 nerve conduction studies found mild entrapment of the left ulnar nerve. The Board finds that a remand is necessary for further development and an updated opinion.
The deciding factor: The evidence has changed significantly since the last VA examination, necessitating additional medical evaluation to determine if any diagnosed conditions are consistent with onset in service.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral upper extremity nerve entrapment, hand pain, wrist pain, elbow pain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 26, 2015
- Citation
- 1536522
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1536522.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the matter of service connection for hand pain to provide the Veteran with a VA examination.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including neck pain, ankle and hip pain, hand and elbow pain, migraine headaches, psychomotor epilepsy, periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD), chronic fatigue syndrome, prevent him from maintaining substantially gainful employment. The Board grants total disability for individual unemployability (TDIU) throughout the period on appeal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional examinations and interviews, as well as further development of his claims.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for special monthly compensation based on need for aid and attendance of another person due to service-connected disabilities, as well as housebound status due to service-connected disabilities. The evidence did not establish that the Veteran was in need of regular aid and assistance or permanently housebound solely due to his service-connected conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.