The Veteran's myofascial lumbar syndrome has been manifested by subjective complaints of pain and objective findings of forward flexion to 90 degrees without evidence of any separately ratable neurological manifestations, ankylosis, or intervertebral disc syndrome with any period of incapacitation. The current rating under the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine is adequate.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's disability does not meet the criteria for a higher initial rating as his range of motion falls within the parameters of the currently assigned 10 percent rating.
- Claimed conditions
- myofascial lumbar syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- September 9, 2015
- Citation
- 1538597
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1538597.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's increased rating for low back disability and earlier effective date are denied. Service connection for bilateral lower extremity sciatic nerve radiculopathy is granted as secondary to the service-connected low back disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for various lower extremity and back disabilities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology. The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is granted, but his other conditions are remanded.
- Granted
The Board granted a 20 percent rating for the Veteran's myofascial lumbar syndrome prior to October 8, 2018 and denied an increased rating thereafter. The effective date remains pending as it is not specified in the decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination reports that did not address functional loss during flare-ups, and a new examination is needed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.