The Board has determined that the Veteran does not meet the criteria for service connection for a right eye disorder or presbyopia, as there is no evidence of chronic residual disability from the corneal abrasions in service and both conditions are considered to be related to natural aging.
The deciding factor: There was no evidence of chronic residual disability from the corneal abrasions in service and both conditions (presbyopia and right eye disorder) were found to be age-related, not service-connected.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Eye Disorder, Presbyopia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 15, 2015
- Citation
- 1539507
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1539507.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's right eye disability, including a corneal abrasion from service and current conditions like refractive error, presbyopia, mild cataracts, and blepharitis, is being remanded for further evaluation. The TDIU claim is also remanded due to its interdependence with the service connection issue.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient development and lack of a SSOC. The Veteran's vision disability, including refractive errors, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, cataracts, astigmatism, and presbyopia are being reviewed for service connection.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to insufficient evidence showing that his right eye disorder was caused by or aggravated by VA treatment, including the December 2015 YAG capsulotomy.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete findings in previous VA examinations and a need for further clarification of certain medical records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.