The Veteran's request for a videoconference hearing has been scheduled, but the notification was not sent to his new address in Tennessee. The case is being remanded to schedule the appellant for a Board videoconference hearing at the Memphis RO.
The deciding factor: The Veteran requested a videoconference hearing and provided a new address, but the notification of the hearing was not sent to this address.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic eye disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 17, 2015
- Citation
- 1539921
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1539921.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for a chronic eye disability and remanded the issue of eligibility for VA outpatient dental treatment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA opinions obtained on remand are inadequate and the claims for service connection must be remanded again.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's chronic eye disability, including watery eyes and blurred vision, is not service-connected as there is no evidence of a nexus between his current condition and his military service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for chronic eye disability, residuals of malaria, and chloracne. The evidence does not support a finding of current disabilities for any of these conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.