The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining an addendum opinion from a VA examiner regarding whether the Veteran's IgA nephropathy is related to his service-connected blastomycosis of the lungs and whether it was aggravated by that condition.
The deciding factor: The decision is remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions on the issue of secondary service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- IgA nephropathy
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 25, 2015
- Citation
- 1541521
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1541521.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected left leg amputation was a contributory cause of his death from renal conditions, and thus grants service connection for the cause of death.
- Granted
The Board granted an effective date of August 30, 2016, for the award of a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) and basic eligibility to Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) based on permanent and total disability status.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for IgA nephropathy and peripheral edema of the left and right lower extremities, finding that these conditions are proximately due to the Veteran's service-connected allergic rhinitis and hypertensive heart disease, respectively.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to ambiguities in the nature and progression of the Veteran's kidney diseases, as well as the need for further clarification on whether his current kidney disabilities are related to active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.