The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a new VA examination to determine the current severity of his service-connected right great toe fracture. The claim will be returned to the Board after further development.
The deciding factor: The Veteran testified that his condition has worsened since his last VA examination, necessitating additional medical evaluation and assessment.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a fracture of the right great toe
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 6, 2015
- Citation
- 1542854
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1542854.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need to obtain post-service treatment records and military retiree records.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for several disabilities, including right knee DJD, hypertension, a fracture of the right great toe, and deviated septum. The Veteran's initial ratings have been increased to 10 percent for these conditions effective August 1, 2007.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination and obtaining SSA records. The examiner will assess the effect of his service-connected disabilities on his employability.
- Denied
The veteran's claim for an increased rating and earlier effective date for his service-connected right foot injury residuals was denied. The Board found that it was not factually ascertainable that the disability had increased prior to November 18, 2002.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.