The Board found that the evidence does not support a finding of service connection for right eye injury residuals or residual infection of amputation of the right third finger, as there is no causal relationship between these conditions and the Veteran's active duty service.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner provided an opinion stating it is unlikely that the right eye condition was caused by the right eye injury while on ACDUTRA, and the residual infection of the amputation did not occur during service.
- Claimed conditions
- right eye injury residuals, residual infection of amputation of the right third finger
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 13, 2015
- Citation
- 1543704
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1543704.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus and remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and right eye injury residuals.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims for service connection for right eye injury residuals, status post corneal transplant and bilateral hearing loss. The decision is based on direct service connection due to in-service noise exposure.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed without prejudice due to his death, and the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal at this time.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to a need for clarification of the October 2008 examination report and an addendum opinion from the July 2017 VA examiner regarding the Veteran's right eye disorder.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.