The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to assess the current manifestations of his service-connected skin disorder and outstanding VA treatment records.
The deciding factor: The decision requires further evidence due to the need for an updated VA examination and review of recent VA treatment records.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic pruritus, recurrent skin eruptions
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 14, 2015
- Citation
- 1543844
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1543844.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's initial claim for a compensable evaluation for chronic pruritus and recurrent skin eruptions was granted. However, the claim for an increased rating beyond 30 percent for scarring associated with these conditions from January 15, 2016, was denied.
- Granted
The Veteran's initial compensable evaluation for chronic pruritus, recurrent skin eruptions, prior to January 15, 2016, was granted. The Veteran's increased evaluation from 30 percent disabling, effective January 15, 2016, remains on appeal.
- Granted
The veteran's service-connected dermatophytosis, involving his feet and groin area, is productive of persistent burning sensation, pruritus, toenail dystrophy, scaling of the skin, and hyperpigmentation. The Board has determined that a 10 percent rating for this condition is warranted.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.