The Board found that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for a TDIU due to his service-connected pulmonary sarcoidosis, but failed to apply the correct regulations regarding reduction of disability ratings. The decision is reversed and the TDIU is restored.
The deciding factor: The Board incorrectly applied the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.343 in determining that the Veteran was not entitled to a TDIU, despite reducing his disability rating for pulmonary sarcoidosis from 60% to 30%.
- Claimed conditions
- Pulmonary Sarcoidosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- October 15, 2015
- Citation
- 1544008
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1544008.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board found the reduction from 100 to 30 percent for pulmonary sarcoidosis was proper, but later determined this decision contained legal errors and revised it to restore the 100 percent rating.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for extension of the temporary total evaluation and increased evaluations for his service-connected conditions are remanded due to incomplete adjudication and need for additional examinations.
- Granted
The Veteran's pulmonary sarcoidosis with decreased pulmonary function, granuloma, chronic fatigue, headaches, and joint pain is rated at a maximum of 100 percent. The Veteran's depressive disorder and PTSD are each rated at 70 percent. He is also granted TDIU based on his service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an evaluation higher than 30 percent for pulmonary sarcoidosis prior to April 1, 2016 was denied as the evidence did not show that he required daily high dose corticosteroids or immuno-suppressive medications.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for bilateral sarcoidosis of the eye was denied as his vision correction was at least 20/40 in both eyes, without visual field defects.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.