The Board finds that the Veteran's current gynecological disorder, including uterine fibroids, cervical polyps, and possible adenomyosis, is not etiologically related to her active military service. The Veteran had an in-service manifestation of dysfunctional uterine bleeding but does not have a current diagnosis of endometriosis.
The deciding factor: The June 2014 VA examination report indicated that the Veteran's current gynecological symptoms are not related to her in-service uterine bleeding and subsequent menopause, with no evidence of endometriosis.
- Claimed conditions
- Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding, Uterine Fibroids, Cervical Polyps, Possible Adenomyosis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 2, 2015
- Citation
- 1546416
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1546416.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for sinusitis and denied the claims for a compensable rating for rhinitis, uterine fibroids, and menstrual disorder.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render her unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation, and TDIU is granted.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not render her unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment prior to April 19, 2010.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to incomplete information regarding her period of active duty and reserve service. The claims are also remanded for additional medical opinions on the etiology of diagnosed psychiatric disorders, gynecological disabilities, and fibromyalgia.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.