The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the nature and etiology of any residuals of a cold injury to the lower extremities, including whether they are related to service.
The deciding factor: Additional medical evidence was submitted by the Veteran which requires further examination and opinion regarding his claimed conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of cold injury to left lower extremity, residuals of cold injury to right lower extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 5, 2015
- Citation
- 1546841
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1546841.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including tension headaches and multiple shoulder injuries, have rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the cause of death, attributing it to the Veteran's service-connected cold injury residuals. The appellant is now entitled to benefits.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran is seeking service connection for cold injury residuals in multiple upper and lower extremities. The Board has determined that further development, including a VA examination, is needed to address the etiology of these disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of cold injury to his lower extremities and pulmonary disorder with emphysema, as well as reopening his diabetes mellitus claim. The decision also dismissed his request for an increased rating for bilateral pes planus.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.