The Veteran's service-connected endometriosis ultimately resulted in a hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy, and the Board finds that this condition is related to her active duty service.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's service-connected endometriosis led to the need for a hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy due to uncontrolled bleeding and uterine prolapse symptoms.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 6, 2015
- Citation
- 1547203
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1547203.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for the residuals of a hysterectomy and migraines have been remanded due to new evidence submitted since the July 2018 rating decision. The Board found that the Veteran has provided new and relevant evidence sufficient to reconsider her claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim is being remanded due to a duty to assist error and the claims are intertwined with the bilateral oophorectomy claim. The Veteran contends that she underwent a removal of her ovaries as a result of the service-connected hysterectomy, but the VA examiner found no evidence of ovarian conditions in her records. She also submitted medical evidence showing she had a bilateral oophorectomy and a private opinion provided a positive nexus for service connection.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted earlier effective dates for service connection of colon cancer, diabetes mellitus type II, residuals of a hysterectomy, and diabetic neuropathies of the upper and lower extremities. The claims are remanded for further action on TDIU and SMC.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for residuals of a hysterectomy and skin disability affecting the bilateral feet, as these conditions are not attributable to active military service or secondary to any service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.