The Veteran's meralgia paresthetica has been manifested by numbness, tingling, pain, and sensory deficit of the anterior mid-thigh, lower thigh and lateral thigh. The Board finds that the manifestations of the Veteran's meralgia cannot be considered severe, since motor and reflex examinations were normal and only a sensory deficit is shown.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence weighs against a higher rating for meralgia paresthetica as there are no manifestations of severe to complete paralysis to the external cutaneous nerve of the left thigh.
- Claimed conditions
- meralgia paresthetica, thigh pain, paresthesia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 9, 2015
- Citation
- 1547281
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1547281.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the claims for service connection for bilateral hip osteoarthritis and meralgia paresthetica, finding that there was no evidence to support a direct or secondary relationship between these conditions and the Veteran's active service.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for lumbosacral strain with degenerative disc disease and a bilateral knee strain, while denying service connection for fibromyalgia, an undiagnosed Gulf War illness (UGWI), or a medically unexplained chronic multi-symptom illness (MUCMI).
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for paresthesia and chronic constipation due to inadequate VA examination reports and opinions. The AOJ will obtain new examinations and medical opinions.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for beneficiary travel expenses were denied because they were not submitted within the required 30-day filing deadline, despite a previous suspension of the deadline due to the COVID-19 emergency.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.