The Veteran is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C. 1151 for additional disability resulting from VA surgical treatment in January 1986, which allegedly caused deformity and neuropathy of his left middle finger. The case is being remanded to obtain medical records, informed consent documents, and a VA examination.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claim requires further investigation due to the need for additional medical evidence and an opinion regarding whether the claimed disability was proximately caused by carelessness or negligence on the part of VA.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of tendon laceration, left middle finger with neuropathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 25, 2015
- Citation
- 1549698
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1549698.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of tendon laceration, left middle finger with neuropathy due to a VA surgery and treatment in 1986 because the evidence did not show that the disability was caused by VA care.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to conflicting medical opinions and additional relevant evidence that needs to be reviewed.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.