The Board has vacated its July 2014 decision and remanded the case for compliance with a Joint Motion for Remand. The case is now being reviewed to determine if there is a causal relationship between the Veteran's exposure to JP-4 jet fuel and his post-service diagnosis of metastatic gastric carcinoma.
The deciding factor: The Board found that VA was not required to obtain a medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's cause of death as there was no credible evidence of herbicide exposure during service or any other indication that his fatal disease was related to service. However, the examiner did not address whether the Veteran's exposure to JP-4 jet fuel caused or resulted in his post-service diagnosis.
- Claimed conditions
- metastatic gastric carcinoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 4, 2015
- Citation
- 1550989
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1550989.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's cause of death from metastatic gastric carcinoma was not service-connected, and there is no evidence to support presumptive service connection due to Camp Lejeune exposure.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's death was caused by metastatic gastric carcinoma, which is presumed to have been incurred in or related to his military service. The Board granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death based on the PACT Act presumption.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death due to metastatic gastric carcinoma, which is presumed to have been incurred in or related to his military service under the PACT Act.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's cause of death, metastatic gastric carcinoma, was presumptively related to his service in Southwest Asia and the PACT Act exposure presumption.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.