The Veteran's claim for service connection for porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT) as a result of exposure to herbicides is being remanded due to the need for further examination and review.
The deciding factor: Further evaluation is required to determine if the Veteran's current skin disabilities are related to his military service, including presumed exposure to herbicides.
- Claimed conditions
- porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 16, 2015
- Citation
- 1552620
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1552620.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's skin disability, including seborrheic dermatitis of the face and porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT), based on exposure to herbicide agents during his military service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection was denied because the Board Appeal request was not timely filed, and good cause has not been shown to accept a late filing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for CAD, DMII, PCT, bilateral lower extremity neuropathy as secondary to DMII, and stroke as secondary to DMII due to a lack of consideration on the merits.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's appeal was granted for the purchase of a 20 foot x 28 foot heated, ADA-compliant greenhouse on concrete grade with indoor lights, 4 electrical outlets, 4 water bibs, and a hydroponic system. The decision is based on mutual agreement between the Veteran and his former counselor in April 2017.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.