The Veteran's current lung disease was not incurred or aggravated in service and it may not be presumed to have been incurred therein.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence of a continuity of symptomatology since service, and the Veteran did not report any such symptoms. The claim is denied as there is no direct evidence linking the current lung disease to service.
- Claimed conditions
- Lung Disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 18, 2015
- Citation
- 1552951
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1552951.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities from January 10, 2016 to June 25, 2018, finding that his service-connected conditions did not preclude him from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to conflicting evidence regarding whether the Veteran requires regular aid and attendance from another individual due to his service-connected disabilities alone. The AOJ will obtain relevant treatment records, secure SSA disability benefits records, and arrange an aid and attendance examination.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran does not have a current respiratory disability, such as COPD, that manifested during or due to active military service. The right hip disability claim is no longer in dispute since it was granted in a separate rating decision.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is proximately due to or the result of his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The lung disease is found to be a residual of asbestos exposure during active duty.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.