The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an annual clothing allowance as there is no evidence showing that his topical lotion prescribed to treat service-connected foot dermatophytosis causes irreparable damage to outer garments.
The deciding factor: The VA determined that the topical lotion used by the Veteran does not cause irreparable damage to his outer garments, and therefore, he is not eligible for an annual clothing allowance.
- Claimed conditions
- foot dermatophytosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 5, 2016
- Citation
- 1600215
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1600215.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for a bilateral foot skin disorder, finding it at least as likely as not incurred in service. The issues of pes planus, plantar heel spurs, hammertoe deformity, and dermatitis are not within the Board's jurisdiction due to lack of proper filing.
- Granted
The Veteran's low back disorder and hypertension are granted service connection, while his foot dermatophytosis is reopened but denied. The left knee condition is denied as not related to service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.