The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining an addendum medical opinion and scheduling a hearing. The appellant's claim of service connection for the cause of her husband's death remains on appeal.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was insufficient evidence to support the denial of the claim and that further development is needed to ensure compliance with prior remand instructions and Court guidelines.
- Claimed conditions
- astrocytoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 12, 2016
- Citation
- 1601246
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1601246.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew her appeals for the 100% rating for astrocytoma, SMC reinstatement, and DEA eligibility effective August 1, 2021.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's astrocytoma is related to his service, specifically his exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam. The examiner must determine if the Veteran's condition falls under the presumptive diseases associated with herbicide exposure and/or if it was caused by such exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran seeks service connection for astrocytoma, a form of brain cancer. The Board finds that the development under 38 U.S.C. § 3.311 is not adequate to decide the claim and remands it for additional development including obtaining private treatment records and scheduling an examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's cause of death is remanded for further review due to new evidence submitted by the Appellant suggesting a possible link between his astrocytoma and exposure to herbicides during service. The DIC claim is also remanded as it is inextricably intertwined with the service connection issue.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.