The Veteran's lung condition, characterized by recurrent pneumonia and lung scarring, has been rated at a 30 percent level based on post-bronchodilator FEV-1/FVC results between 56 to 70 percent. The Board finds that the evidence is in equipoise regarding attributing such objective criteria of the Veteran's pulmonary function to his service-connected lung condition.
The deciding factor: The VA C&P examination and private treatment records consistently showed post-bronchodilator FEV-1/FVC results between 56 to 70 percent, which warrants a 30 percent rating under DC 6845.
- Claimed conditions
- Recurrent pneumonia, Lung scarring
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- January 28, 2016
- Citation
- 1602648
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1602648.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection, as the evidence did not support higher ratings or a grant of service connection.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's small cell carcinoma of the lung and recurrent pneumonia were not service-connected, and did not find that his service-connected conditions contributed to his death.
- Denied
The Board found no evidence of the veteran's exposure to ionizing radiation in service. There is also no competent medical evidence linking any of his current conditions to service or to such exposure. Therefore, service connection for these claims was denied.
- Granted
The Board found that the veteran's death was caused by improper and inadequate medical care during his February 1995 VA hospitalization, resulting in a grant of dependency and indemnity compensation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.