The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining treatment records and attempting to corroborate his in-service stressors. He also needs a VA examination for his eye disability and psychiatric disorder.
The deciding factor: The Board instructed the RO to complete necessary development as outlined in the February 2015 Remand, which has not been done yet.
- Claimed conditions
- left eye corneal scarring, an acquired psychiatric disorder, claimed as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 4, 2016
- Citation
- 1604162
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1604162.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is denied as there is no evidence of a nexus between the condition and active service.,The Veteran's right wrist tendon strain, right ankle tendonitis, and lumbar disability are remanded for further evaluation due to inadequate examination reports.,Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD) is remanded due to incomplete VA records not being obtained.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected PTSD and/or diabetes aggravated his left eye corneal scarring.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding whether the Veteran's PTSD clearly and unmistakably existed prior to service and did not worsen during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information and missed appointments, requiring further development including scheduling a VA examination for PTSD.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.