The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a diagnosed left knee disability, and his service-connected lumbar spine and cervical spine disabilities do not meet the criteria for higher ratings. The Veteran's tinea pedis is rated appropriately, as are his hearing loss and CTS. His acquired psychiatric disorder, right ankle condition, and head injury with headaches and myofascial pain syndrome do not warrant increased ratings. Finally, the Board has determined that the Veteran meets the criteria for TDIU based on his service-connected disabilities.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence fails to establish a current disability of the left knee or any other claimed conditions. The Veteran's lumbar and cervical spine disabilities do not meet the criteria for higher ratings under the applicable rating schedule, as they do not result in forward flexion less than 30 degrees or combined range of motion less than 170 degrees. His tinea pedis is rated appropriately at 0 percent, his hearing loss does not warrant a compensable rating, and his CTS is rated at the maximum allowable under Diagnostic Code 8515.
- Claimed conditions
- Left Knee Disability, Right Knee Disability, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type II (DM), Lumbar Strain and Midback Injury, Cervical Spine Injury, Tinea Pedis, Right Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Acquired Psychiatric Disorder, to include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Depressive Disorder with Anxiety, Posttraumatic Changes of the Right Ankle with Osteoarthritis, Ligament Strains, Tenosynovitis, and Plantar Fasciitis, Head Injury with Headaches and Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 8, 2016
- Citation
- 1604580
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1604580.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected knee disabilities are rated at 10% each, and the Board finds that higher ratings are not warranted based on the evidence of record.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral knee disabilities are not related to his active service, and thus denied both claims for service connection.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection of a right knee disability, finding that there is no evidence to support an etiological relationship between his current condition and his military service.
- Denied
The Veteran's left knee disability is currently rated at 30 percent, and the Board finds no evidence of clear and unmistakable error in assigning an effective date of June 19, 2002.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.